| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||1354 |
| Printed||4 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||134 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
Click on image for details.
|BRIEF RESEARCH COMMUNICATION
|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 74-79
Validation of revised reading the mind in the eyes test in the Indian (Bengali) population: A preliminary study
Madhushree Chakrabarty1, Gargi Dasgupta2, Rudraprasad Acharya2, Seshadri Sekhar Chatterjee3, Prathama Guha4, Matthew K Belmonte5, Kaberi Bhattacharya6
1 Independent Researcher, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Psychiatry, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
3 Department of Psychiatry, Diamond Harbour Government Medical College and Hospital, Diamond Harbour, West Bengal, India
4 Department of Psychiatry, Calcutta National Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
5 The Com DEALL Trust, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India; Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, England, UK
6 Department of Psychiatry, Midnapore Medical College, Midnapore, West Bengal, India
Background: Social cognition deficits are common in clinical populations but there is a dearth of standardized social cognition assessment tools in India. Theory of mind (ToM) is an important aspect of social cognition which is often assessed with the revised reading the mind in eyes test (RMET-R). However, we do not have a statistically validated version of the test for the Indian population.
Aim: This study aims to assess the acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Bengali version of the RMET-R.
Materials and Methods: We administered the RMET-R to 23 patients with chronic schizophrenia (SCZ), 22 patients with bipolar disorder, and 104 healthy controls (HCs) to evaluate the reliability and validity of the instrument in the Indian (Bengali) population.
Results: We obtained moderate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.6) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.64, P < 0.001). Positive correlations were found between RMET-R and Wechsler picture arrangement (r = 0.60, P < 0.001), picture completion (r = 0.54, P < 0.001), and comprehension subtests (r = 0.48, P < 0.001). Patients with SCZ (M = 49.7, standard deviation [SD] = 16.5) scored significantly lower than HCs (M = 68.9, SD = 13.8) (P = 0.008; Cohen's d = 1.3) on the RMET-R. Thus this tool could discriminate patients who are reported to have Theory of Mind deficits from healthy controls.
Conclusion: The Bengali version of the RMET-R is a reliable and valid tool for assessing first-order ToM insofar as the original RMET-R measures this construct.
611 MB Road, Birati, Kolkata - 700 051, West Bengal
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*