Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 532 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4627    
    Printed24    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded758    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
MISCELLANY  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 62  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 495-497
Prevention of occupational stress in health-care workers during COVID-19 pandemic


1 Department of Mental Health, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Peshawar Medical College, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan
2 University of Toronto and Staff Psychiatrist, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
3 Psychiatry, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan
4 Consultant Psychiatrist at NHS and Honorary Associate Professor, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, UK

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission10-Jul-2020
Date of Acceptance31-Aug-2020
Date of Web Publication28-Sep-2020
 

   Abstract 


In a humanitarian crisis, healthcare workers are on the frontline in providing their services. Despite being crisis management personnel, healthcare workers may get exposed to occupational stress due to unprecedented circumstances, challenges in delivery of high-quality care, lack of resources, and most importantly for being at high risk to suffer from the impact of the situation itself. Therefore, it is imperative to maintain the mental health of healthcare workers on a regular basis and more so during a pandemic like COVID-19. For addressing the occupational stress in healthcare workers, a Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) based intervention is suggested, also supported by a Cochrane review, which can build/ improve/ enhance resilience, needed to shield individuals against the development of psychopathology, at the public health level in humanitarian crises. In addition to developing resilience, which will be helpful in combating anxiety, depression, somatization, and incapacitation, CBT will also help in dealing with the social isolation which has been part and parcel of COVID-19 and similar pandemic situations.

Keywords: COVID-19, healthcare workers, occupational stress

How to cite this article:
Irfan M, Naeem F, Afridi MI, Javed A. Prevention of occupational stress in health-care workers during COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Psychiatry 2020;62, Suppl S3:495-7

How to cite this URL:
Irfan M, Naeem F, Afridi MI, Javed A. Prevention of occupational stress in health-care workers during COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2020 [cited 2022 Nov 28];62, Suppl S3:495-7. Available from: https://www.indianjpsychiatry.org/text.asp?2020/62/9/495/296517





   Introduction Top


Health-care professionals are the frontline workers in dealing with the humanitarian crisis. There is sufficient research to highlight the level of stress faced by the health-care workers under routine clinical care, which is increased under unusual circumstances such as a pandemic. Although the best approach under such circumstances is not entirely clear, it is imperative to maintain the mental health of health-care workers, to control infectious diseases in an effective way. The initiative of public psychological counseling through telephone helplines proved very effective in combating psychological issues during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic. However, only limited literature is available on support services for health professionals during a humanitarian crisis.

Exposure to stressors at work is believed to provoke stress among health-care workers in routine care, the effects of which are thought to be mitigated by one's ability to personally deal with them. Several factors such as increased workload, low social support, lack of skills, organizational conflicts and problems, and emotional reaction to dying and suffering patients contribute to occupational stress in health-care workers. In a hospital setting, psychological working environment (inappropriate behaviors and verbal abuse), physical environment (space, lighting, disruption, and temperature), work overload, inadequate allocation of work, working long hours, repetitive duties, new technology, and management issues among others cause most of the stress. This stress might damage professional efficacy, thereby decreasing attention, weakening decision-making skills, reducing concentration, and negatively affecting the worker's ability to develop a professional relationship with their patients. The data on turnover and absenteeism indicate the high economic impact of such conditions. More than 10% of total claims for occupational diseases are attributed to stress at work.[1]

Physicians may suffer from negative outcomes of work stress, including adverse psychological well-being, alcohol dependency, a rise in suicide attempts, job burnout, and many other psychological issues. The report of the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention laid further emphasis on the enormity of the situation, claiming that compared to other professionals, death by suicide is 70% higher among doctors on an average, and female doctors are 250%–400% more likely to be affected.[2]

Even though a large number of review articles have been published detailing the efficacy of interventions for prevention and/or treatment of stress, only a few of them specifically focus on interventions targeting stress prevention among health-care workers. A recent Cochrane review of 58 studies, with 7188 participants regarding interventions used for health work-related stress concludes that stress is moderately reduced by cognitive-behavioral training and physical and mental relaxation. Changing work schedules might also be effective, but no clear effects are inferred from other organizational interventions against stress. However, there is no reported evaluation of an intervention to help health workers dealing with humanitarian crises such as floods, tsunamis, or pandemics.[3]

We suggest that cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)-based intervention might be the way forward. CBT is recommended by the national guidelines to treat mental and emotional health problems in most developed nations. CBT can be provided in a self-help or guided self-help format in either paper or electronic format. There is evidence from research that CBT can improve resilience[4] and therefore can be used and might be an ideal choice in building resilience at the public health level in humanitarian crises. Similarly, developing evidence-based approaches for enhancing the resilience of those health-care workers that help patients during a pandemic has already been emphasized.[5]

Resilience is the ability to recover readily from adversity. Treatment of diverse chronic diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, Chagas disease, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis has been reported to be impacted by the virtue of resilience. A recent systematic review indicates a negative relationship between resilience and anxiety, depression, somatization, and incapacitation and shows that resilience acts as a shield against the development of psychopathology among those facing challenges.[6]

The COVID-19 pandemic is currently putting substantial stress on everyone; however, health-care workers among other targeted groups remain most affected. Studies have reported a high prevalence of posttraumatic stress related to SARS among health-care workers and other employees of hospitals in Canada, Singapore, Taiwan, China, and Hong Kong. According to the World Health Organization, SARS infected health-care workers who represented more than 20% of all the people who contracted the infection, at a higher rate than any other group. Literature has documented that a person's possibility of developing PTSD is influenced by the perceived risk levels which might be affected by factors like unfamiliarity with and perceived uncontrollability of the hazards associated with an event. Fear, anxiety, stress, depression, and burnout have been commonly reported among frontline health-care and support staff working in COVID-19. There has been no time to train frontline workers on building resilience to deal with the situation causing various psychological issues. Although there have been online interventions including CBT for depression, anxiety, and insomnia and artificial intelligence-based programs for the psychological crisis for the general public, there is a scarcity of interventions for the improvement of mental health (including the building of resilience) of frontline health-care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A recent publication outlining a psychological intervention plan to help health-care workers with COVID-19-related stress mainly aimed at three areas that included: (a) generating a psychological intervention medical team which to prepare medical staff to deal with common psychological issues, conducted online courses; (b) generating a psychological assistance hotline team that supervised and guided in solving psychological problems; and (c) psychological interventions, for mitigating stress, that included a diverse set of group activities. The program was modified based on feedback from the staff.[7]

COVID-19 is posing a challenge to the psychological resilience of both health-care managers and health-care workers, for which some tips are shared in [Box 1]. However, formulating psychological interventions for improving psychological resilience and mental health is of utmost importance during COVID-19 and similar situations in times to come. We feel that CBT for dealing with social isolation and developing resilience may be the way forward.



Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Williamson AM. Managing stress in the workplace: Part II–The scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide. Int J Ind Ergon 1994;14:171-96.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Familoni OB. An overview of stress in medical practice in Nigeria. Niger Hosp Pract 2008;2:102-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Marine A, Ruotsalainen J, Serra C, Verbeek J. Preventing occupational stress in healthcare workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD002892. Published 2006 Oct 18. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub2.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Norte CE, Souza GG, Pedrozo AL, Mendonça-de-Souza AC, Figueira I, Volchan E, et al. Impact of cognitive-behavior therapy on resilience-related neurobiological factors. Arch Clini Psychiatry (São Paulo) 2011;38:43-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Maunder RG, Leszcz M, Savage D, Adam MA, Peladeau N, Romano D, et al. Applying the lessons of SARS to pandemic influenza: An evidence-based approach to mitigating the stress experienced by healthcare workers. Can J Public Health 2008;99:486-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Arnetz J, Rofa Y, Arnetz B, Ventimiglia M, Jamil H. Resilience as a protective factor against the development of psychopathology among refugees. J Nerv Ment Dis 2013;201:167-72.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Chen Q, Liang M, Li Y, Guo J, Fei D, Wang L, et al. Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry 2020;7:e15-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Muhammad Irfan
Head, Department of Mental Health, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Peshawar Medical College, Riphah International University, Islamabad
Pakistan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_844_20

Rights and Permissions



This article has been cited by
1 Effects of Occupational Stress, Self-Efficacy and Mental Health During the Pandemic on Hospital Sanitation Workers in Malaysia
Ayesha Nawal, Muhammad Shoaib, Roman Zámecník, Asad Ur Rehman
Evaluation & the Health Professions. 2022; : 0163278722
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Management of Somatization in COVID-19: A Narrative Review
Dhanashree Wankhade, Ashish P Anjankar
Cureus. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 The impact of work-related stress on the cognition domain of executive functioning of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
Sahar Ali Farahat, Omnia Raafat Amin, Hatem Sherif Hamdy, Marwa Mohammed Fouad
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Assessment of Psychological Distress in Health-care Workers during and after the First Wave of COVID-19: A Canadian Longitudinal Study: Évaluation de la Détresse Psychologique Chez Les Travailleurs de la Santé Durant et Après la Première Vague de la COVID
Marie-Michèle Dufour, Nicolas Bergeron, Axelle Rabasa, Stéphane Guay, Steve Geoffrion
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2021; 66(9): 807
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top