Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 662 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page


    Advanced search

    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded118    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


 Table of Contents    
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 61  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 218-219
Letter to editor regarding “comparison of efficacy of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium”

Department of Psychiatry, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication11-Mar-2019

How to cite this article:
Kumar P, Khurana H, Kumar A, Sethi S. Letter to editor regarding “comparison of efficacy of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium”. Indian J Psychiatry 2019;61:218-9

How to cite this URL:
Kumar P, Khurana H, Kumar A, Sethi S. Letter to editor regarding “comparison of efficacy of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium”. Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2019 [cited 2022 Nov 29];61:218-9. Available from:


We found the study by Jain et al.[1] quite interesting. The sample having been allocated to treatment arms randomly and inclusion of flowchart make this study particularly attractive. However, we feel that the study needs replication with following points in consideration.

The authors have mistakenly classified the study by Hu et al. referred to on page 452 as a nonrandomized one.[2]

The authors have used randomization to prevent bias in the results; however, the unbiasedness is apparently lost due to heavy (24%) dropout. The authors could have taken up analysis of dropouts, survival analysis or intent to treat design for unbiased interpretation of the results. This was an open-label study by design; however, the authors while discussing mentioned this being a single-blind study. Both these statements are contradictory.

The control of concomitant treatments appears difficult as the patients have been selected from different specialties. Thus, the primary diagnosis as well as treatment is likely to be heterogeneous make it improper to call the study as an efficacy study. Moreover, the inclusion of a placebo arm makes it easy to interpret the results of an efficacy study.[3]

The authors appear having overstepped the recommendation proposed by Lacasse et al. In fact, they have clearly stated that evidence till now is falling short of recommending any antipsychotic as first-line choice in managing delirium. They have in fact recommended treatment of the underlying cause and supportive treatment for delirious patients.[4] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines also recommend to be cautious in the use of antipsychotics in delirium and at the best avoid it.[5]

To the best of our efforts, we could not find any recommendation about antipsychotic doses with severity of delirium. It would be interesting if the authors could throw some light on use of different doses for different severity of delirium as shown the [Table 1] of the study.[1]
Table 1: Doses of olanzapine and haloperidol used and MDAS score

Click here to view

The authors also seemed unclear about the method of reporting drug doses. While mentioning mean doses, the authors have mentioned range too; however, it appears that it is actually the minimum and maximum doses rather than the range. Moreover, it is always a good practice to mention standard deviations along with the mean values as both statistics are applicable on continuous variables and take all values in consideration whereas the range is based only on two extreme values does not give any robust idea about distribution pattern of the values in the sample.

To us the results of the study appear having little external validity as the sociodemographic, and the clinical profile of the patients is not mentioned anywhere in the study. In subsequent studies, care needs to be taken for heterogeneity in the sample, inclusion of placebo arm and managing attrition rate either by robust experimental design or by statistical methods.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

   References Top

Jain R, Arun P, Sidana A, Sachdev A. Comparison of efficacy of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium. Indian J Psychiatry 2017;59:451-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Hu H, Deng W, Yang H, Liu Y. Olanzapine and haloperidol for senile delirium: A randomized controlled observation. Chin J Clin Rehabil 2006;83:88-190.  Back to cited text no. 2
Singal AG, Higgins PD, Waljee AK. A primer on effectiveness and efficacy trials. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2014;5:e45.  Back to cited text no. 3
Lacasse H, Perreault MM, Williamson DR. Systematic review of antipsychotics for the treatment of hospital-associated delirium in medically or surgically ill patients. Ann Pharmacother 2006;40:1966-73.  Back to cited text no. 4
Young J, Murthy L, Westby M, Akunne A, O'Mahony R, Guideline Development Group, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and management of delirium: Summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2010;341:c3704.  Back to cited text no. 5

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Pawan Kumar
Department of Psychiatry, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_85_18

Rights and Permissions


  [Table 1]