Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 1289 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page


    Advanced search

    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded226    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


LETTER TO EDITOR Table of Contents   
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 73
Antipsychiatry: Meeting the challenge

BE 318, Salt Lake, Kolkata 700064, West Bengal, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

How to cite this article:
Basu AR. Antipsychiatry: Meeting the challenge. Indian J Psychiatry 2006;48:73

How to cite this URL:
Basu AR. Antipsychiatry: Meeting the challenge. Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2006 [cited 2022 Dec 6];48:73. Available from:


The editorial 'Antipsychiatry: Meeting the challenge'[1] is interesting and thought-provoking. When the discipline of psychiatry was being impacted by the Antipsychiatry movement in the 1970s, there were no comments or even any critique on this topic in the Indian Journal of Psychiatry! It is good to see that our journal, albeit after 35 years, has discussed the issue editorially in the present context; it has also tried to strike a balance between the two opposing views: '…the willingness to accept the valid criticisms and the possible abuses or "wrongs" of psychiatry, as well as to be open to a dialogue or multilogue and review of practices if required would not only be strategically sound but also ethically warranted.'

This has opened up possibilities to practice psychiatry not determined by biology alone but a multiverse of episteme that contributes to our knowledge of mental healing. In a recent article, Paul Grobstein, a neuroscientist, has seen science as a culture of 'story telling and story revising'.[2]

However, unlike Grobstein, who wanted to keep science within the boundaries of positivism, I would like to comment on the issue of Antipsychiatry and Postpsychiatry. The concept of Antipsychiatry has lost ground in the present context because of its analytical category being oppositional, dichotomous and binary. Such analyses will eventually take a linear and progressive course, proposing another modernist utopia. The concept of Postpsychiatry moved away from this trap and interpreted contemporary changes using tools of continental philosophy including postmodernism. Thomas and Bracken[3] have explained the differences between 'anti' and 'critical' psychiatry and argued why psychiatry needs to be analysed from pluralistic viewpoints by challenging the omnipotence and centrality of a deterministic and positivist position. Similar issues were raised 4 years ago by a scholar from the University of Pittsburgh, USA.[4]

Our situation is different from Bracken and Bradley because our modernity is received through colonialism and can best be called postcolonial when the debate on de­colonization is quite vibrant.[5] For us, psychiatry brings the challenge of negotiating both modern and non-modern discourses and constructing a course of development that acknowledges the multiverse we live in. This may help in generating our own theories of psychiatry.

   References Top

1.Desai NG. Antipsychiatry: Meeting the challenge [editorial]. Indian J Psychiatry 2005;47:185-7.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Grobstein P. Revisiting science in culture: Science as story telling and story revising. Journal of Research Practice 1; Article M1, 2005. Available from URL: v1.1/grobstein.html (accessed on 23 December 2005).  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Thomas P, Bracken P. Critical psychiatry in practice. Adv Psychiatr Treatment 2004;10:361-70.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Lewis B. Psychiatry and postmodern theory. J Med Hum 2000;21:71-84.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Chakrabarty D. Legacies of Bandung: Decolonisation and the politics of culture. Economic and Political Weekly 2005, November 12. Available from URL: showArticles.php?root=2005&leaf=11&filename=9332& filetype=html (accessed on 8 January 2006).  Back to cited text no. 5    

Correspondence Address:
Amit Ranjan Basu
BE 318, Salt Lake, Kolkata 700064, West Bengal
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.31627

Rights and Permissions