Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 3164 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
Search Again
 Back
 Table of Contents
 
 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert
 Add to My List
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed6774    
    Printed144    
    Emailed4    
    PDF Downloaded626    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal

 
ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPERS
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 34-38

ECT: Knowledge and attitude among patients and their relatives


Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh 160030, India

Correspondence Address:
B S Chavan
Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh 160030
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.31616

Rights and Permissions

Background: It is believed that people lack sound knowledge and appropriate attitude towards electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). However, very little systematic research has gone into this area. Aim: To examine the knowledge and attitude of patients and their relatives towards ECT. Methods: A 16-item questionnaire with satisfactory face validity and content validity was constructed and translated into Hindi. It was then administered to 89 patients and 83 relatives attending the psychiatry services in a major hospital in north India. Results: More than 65% of the respondents in both the groups-patients as well as relatives-gave correct responses such as ECT is life saving, many times it causes temporary but not permanent memory impairment and that ECT is not a non-scientific treatment. There was non-significant disagreement between the two groups. Conclusion: The study is a preliminary exploratory one and is likely to give direction for further research with refined methodology.



[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*

        

Print this article         Email this article